I'm Parikshet. I use ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude regularly for different things. When my classmates ask which one to use for school, I always ask them: for what? Because the honest answer depends on the task. Here is my breakdown after testing all three on real homework scenarios.

The Test Setup

I ran the same tasks through all three: a 400-word persuasive essay, a maths problem set with multi-step algebra, a research question about a historical event, and a creative writing prompt. Here is what I found.

Essay Writing

Winner: Claude.

Claude's writing is the most natural of the three. It varies sentence length well, builds arguments with proper structure, and — crucially — does not sound like an AI wrote it. This matters because teachers and plagiarism detectors are getting better at identifying AI-generated text. Claude's output requires less editing to sound like a real student wrote it.

ChatGPT is close, especially with a detailed prompt. Gemini writes competently but the prose is slightly more formulaic.

Practical tip: Use Claude for first drafts of essays. Then rewrite key sentences in your own words before submitting — use AI as a scaffold, not a final product.

Maths

Winner: ChatGPT (paid) or Gemini with extensions.

Claude struggles more than the others with long chains of numerical calculation — it sometimes makes arithmetic errors mid-way through multi-step problems. ChatGPT Plus with Code Interpreter can run Python to verify every calculation step. Gemini with Wolfram Alpha extension is also strong at maths with working shown.

For basic algebra, all three are fine. For anything complex, use ChatGPT with code execution.

Want to learn AI properly?

I teach kids aged 8–14 how to use AI safely and creatively — no coding needed.

Explore the AI for Kids Course →

Research

Winner: Gemini (with citations).

For research, I need sources I can cite. Gemini defaults to using Google Search and provides links to real pages. ChatGPT with browsing does similar. Claude does not browse the web by default, so it works from its training data — useful for understanding concepts, not reliable for citing recent facts.

Warning: even with web access, always click through to the source. AIs sometimes misrepresent what a source actually says.

Creative Writing

Winner: Claude or ChatGPT (depends on style).

For imaginative fiction — vivid scenes, distinctive character voices, unexpected plot twists — Claude is my preference. It takes more creative risks. ChatGPT is more reliable and consistent but slightly more predictable. Gemini is the weakest of the three for pure creative writing in my testing.

The Honest Summary

TaskBest choiceFree?
Essay writingClaudeYes (claude.ai free tier)
MathsChatGPT PlusNo ($20/month)
Research with sourcesGeminiYes
Creative writingClaudeYes (with limits)
Long conversation/projectClaude (200k context)Yes (with limits)

My starting recommendation for most kids: use Gemini for research and Claude for writing. Both are free. Test ChatGPT's free version for everything else. You do not need to pay for any of them to do excellent school work.